Sunday, March 8, 2026

Dhurandhar 2 Trailer & Ilyas Kashmiri (Pk Barbaric Butcher!)

 



I created the previous post into a video


Exposing Pakistani #Muslims. Examination of Arjun Rampal's dialogue. ..And I quote: Pakistan's military history against India is a stark ledger of crushing defeats and the ignominious surrender of 1971, a truth they drown out with a relentless barrage of boasts and the shadowed hand of terrorism, a twisted game designed to fracture the Indian spirit with corrosive, repetitive lies. The depths of this depravity are laid bare by the chilling account of former President and Army Chief Gen. Pervez Musharraf reportedly honoring and rewarding Ilyas Kashmiri, a militant commander, for bringing the severed head of an Indian army personnel—an act of barbarity met with a reported one lakh Pakistani rupees in a ceremony following an alleged Indian cross-LoC incident in 2000. While Indian soldiers uphold honor, burying even their enemy's dead with dignity, the stark reality reveals a horrifying counterpoint: a narrative of Muslim soldiers allegedly mutilating Indian corpses, a brutal contrast that rips open the very soul of the conflict. These are not mere allegations; they are the brutal, undeniable home truths etched into the very fabric of this relentless, bloody confrontation. end quote Article source: https://www.asianlick.co.uk/entertainment/dhurandhar2trailereview.php https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pakistani_Instrument_of_Surrender https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pervez_Musharraf https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilyas_Kashmiri Beheading of Bhausaheb Maruti Talekar https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beheading_of_Bhausaheb_Maruti_Talekar https://www.hindustantimes.com/world/mush-rewarded-pak-militant-who-slit-throat-of-indian-officer/story-aYRrLk44SkMKaPQeZ8kg7O.html

https://www.nytimes.com/1999/07/17/world/india-buries-soldiers-that-pakistan-won-t-claim.html


Rumble: https://rumble.com/v76ua9q-dhurandhar-2-trailer-and-ilyas-kashmiri-pk-barbaric-butcher.html

Blog: https://nehakulkarni108.blogspot.com/2026/03/dhurandhar-2-trailer-ilyas-kashmiri-pk.html

Sanatani4ever: https://sanatani4ever.freeforums.net/thread/83/dhurandhar-2-trailer-review-balti?page=1&scrollTo=86

AMC: https://asian-massive-crew.com/community/showthread.php?p=228299

Dhurandhar 2 Trailer Review by Balti

 

Dhurandhar 2 Trailer Review




Date Published: Saturday 7th March 2026

Review by Balti

Profile Picture

Trailer Release Date

7th March 2026

Trailer Review & Analysis

The Dhurandhar 2 Trailer just detonated, ripping through the veil of appeasement to unleash a raw, unvarnished truth bomb that shatters denial. No more soft-pedaling; the gloves are off, and reality hits like a gut punch, as its opening dialogue, a chilling echo of Indians (Hindus) described as a weak community, isn't just replayed—it's weaponized to shatter complacency and ignite a sleeping nation. Make no mistake, the bloodline of Ghazni, Ghori, and Timur always saw idolaters as lesser, fodder for their narratives of "great" Islamic rule, a victor's lie etched in our history, and to truly grasp the venomous core of this infidel hate, you must plunge headfirst into the brutal annals of history, straight into the crucible that forged Pakistan itself. This isn't just a trailer; it's a battle cry, a demand to confront the uncomfortable truths buried beneath generations of denial.

Pakistan's military history against India is a stark ledger of crushing defeats and the ignominious surrender of 1971, a truth they drown out with a relentless barrage of boasts and the shadowed hand of terrorism, a twisted game designed to fracture the Indian spirit with corrosive, repetitive lies. The depths of this depravity are laid bare by the chilling account of former President and Army Chief Gen. Pervez Musharraf reportedly honoring and rewarding Ilyas Kashmiri, a militant commander, for bringing the severed head of an Indian army personnel—an act of barbarity met with a reported one lakh Pakistani rupees in a ceremony following an alleged Indian cross-LoC incident in 2000. While Indian soldiers uphold honor, burying even their enemy's dead with dignity, the stark reality reveals a horrifying counterpoint: a narrative of Muslim soldiers allegedly mutilating Indian corpses, a brutal contrast that rips open the very soul of the conflict. These are not mere allegations; they are the brutal, undeniable home truths etched into the very fabric of this relentless, bloody confrontation.

My expectations, fueled by that raw trailer, are locked and loaded for an explosive ride, even as Ranveer Singh, embodying the Sikh powerhouse Jaskirat Singh Rangi, steps into the gritty arena representing a nation, and perhaps, a cultural flashpoint. No quarter given for cultural quibbles; I’m unfazed by the Sikh warrior fronting as a RAW operative, a nameless gunman in the shadows, yet the ground beneath it shifts. What was once a seamless blend, the very DNA of Diwali and Vaisakhi celebrations intertwined in my youth, now feels fractured, the Khalistani poison having seeped in, tearing at the fabric that once bound these identities as one unyielding force. So when those bhangra beats drop, those Punjabi anthems blast, while undeniably awesome, they sometimes land with a jarring echo, a stark reminder of the cultural chasm ripped open. Make no mistake, the film's machinery grinds flawlessly, a relentless engine of cinematic power, but the core truth remains: the hero at its heart is a Punjabi Sikh, not a Hindu, a distinction now charged with an unforeseen weight.

For example, the raw, untamed spectacle of Animal violently shoves a fixated obsession with Sikh elements into every frame, a jarring undercurrent beneath its proclaimed Indian secularism. While Ranbir Kapoor’s character performs intimate pooja havans with his wife, a jarring contradiction erupts as his brutal shootout crews are exclusively turbaned Sikhs, a relentless visual insistence that feels less like representation and more like an addictive behavioral syndrome, desperately masking an insecurity that without Sikhism, you're simply not Indian enough. This aggressive push stands in stark contrast to a film like Dhurandhar, set amidst the Muslim-dominated grit of Lyari in Pakistan, which, despite its slick execution and even a dazzling "Hare Krishna Hare Ram" track seamlessly integrated, never feels the need for such an overbearing, almost desperate, Sikh hype from its creators. Ultimately, Animal doesn't just include; it forces a Sikh narrative, a calculated, almost violent creative choice that screams louder than any bullet.

The narrative explodes from Khalistani ranks, a guttural roar claiming Punjabi Sikhs are mere pawns, bled dry as toys to execute the Indian government's dirty work. Whispers of unknown gunmen, once confined to shadows, now echo like gunfire across the globe, ripping through the silence surrounding figures like Hardeep Singh Nijjar. The Lawrence Bishnoi gang, a transnational viper's nest, gets dragged into the fray, its name hurled into the same breath as these phantom operatives, even as India's foreign ministry spokesman Randhir Jaiswal tries to douse the flames, pointing fingers back at Ottawa for warnings about Bishnoi. But the damage is done; the inference hangs heavy, a suffocating shroud that for some, like Dhurandhar, transforms into a chilling boast: India's unknown gunmen, a shadowy fist guarding the nation's interests far beyond its official borders. This isn't just political maneuvering; it's a brutal chess game played with lives, where the very ambiguity of these 'operatives' serves as both weapon and shield, leaving a trail of bloodied questions in its wake.

Now, there’s nothing inherently wrong with the grand, glorious chaos of cultural or musical fusion in films, to a certain dazzling extent; in that flickering darkness, we crave the electrifying clash of sitars and synths, the Bollywood flash mobs invading samurai epics, a truly wild, boundary-shattering symphony! But rip off those 3D glasses, step out of the multiplex's manufactured twilight, and BAM! The real world hits you like a brick through a stained-glass window, a stark, unyielding truth where the lines aren't merely drawn; they're chiseled into bedrock with sacred hammers, reinforced by ancient scriptures and the roaring dictates from texts aged beyond comprehension. So, while the big screen throws a wild, inclusive party, the hard-nosed world outside remains a mosaic of unyielding, distinct territories, each humming its own ancient, unalterable tune, a stark reminder that some walls aren't meant for dancing through.

In the shadows where nations clash, the brutal truth of espionage isn't a secret; it's a relentless, high-stakes game of survival, each player a blade honed for the kill. Borders are phantoms, easily breached by operatives whose loyalties are iron-forged, leaving behind the chilling question: who truly possesses the lethal edge, the unyielding will to grasp their objectives, no matter the cost? While some, like Pakistan, falter, their failures stacking up, leaving them to wail in the guise of victimhood, the true gladiators of the intelligence world operate with a different kind of fire. Men like Ajit Doval don't just play the game; they redefine it, a ghost in the machine, the very essence of R. Madhavan's chilling portrayal in "Dhurandhar," plunging deep into Pakistan's underbelly from the '80s, a lone wolf tracking militant networks and nuclear shadows, every breath a calculated risk. Doval's legend isn't just whispers; it’s etched in blood and steel, a direct hand in crushing the terror of 15 Indian Airlines hijackings between '71 and '99, a one-man wrecking crew against chaos. This isn't just intelligence gathering; it's a bare-knuckle brawl for supremacy, a testament to the raw, explosive determination of those who refuse to yield, their deeds screaming louder than any lament.

Dhurandhar trailer 2 just hit, a raw, explosive declaration that this film isn't just a hit; it's a guaranteed box office supernova, poised to eclipse even its legendary predecessor. This isn't just a movie; it's a goddamn grenade lobbed straight into the heart of Bollywood, ripping open a festering can of worms that will tear the industry to bloody shreds. Franchises like 'Tiger Zinda Hai' are dead men walking, their glossy, hollow spectacle exposed for the pathetic, spoon-fed garbage it always was, leaving them with no hope against this seismic shift. Audiences are ravenous, hungry for brutal truth, for unvarnished reality mixed with bone-jarring entertainment, not the sanitized, pre-chewed pap fed to them for too long. The game has changed; Dhurandhar isn't playing by their rules—it's rewriting them in blood and fire, leaving the old guard choking on their own lies.

Main Cast

Ranveer Singh, Akshaye Khanna, Sanjay Dutt, Arjun Rampal, and R. Madhavan.

Trailer Run Time

3 Minutes & 25 Seconds

Dhurandhar: The Revenge (2026) Release Date

19th March 2026

News Flash

With "Toxic" now postponed, Dhurandhar 2 is poised to unleash an unprecedented global assault on the box office, benefiting from a newly cleared path and an aggressive release strategy. The film is reportedly targeting an astounding 10,000+ screens worldwide, a move poised to mark the wildest and most ambitious release ever for an Indian film, signaling a colossal industry shift. This monumental screen count, strategically backed by a massive holiday advantage throughout March, fuels expectations of an overwhelming theatrical presence, unequivocally positioning Dhurandhar 2 to dominate multiplexes globally and deliver a record-breaking opening that will redefine industry benchmarks.

Koinoor: Muslim Shia Nader Shah, person who stole the Koinoor

 


Free #Iran from #Islam!

Reminder:

Shia Nader Shah, was also the person who stole the Koinoor, after he defeated the Sunni Muslim Mughals.

..Mughals stole the Koinoor from the Hindus.

#Sikhs later took possession from the Muslim Duranni's.

& #British took Koinoor from Sikhs.



India: Sunni Vs Shia - Battle of Karnal 1739

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Karnal

Nadir Shah (Shia) invades India,

fights with Sunni Muslim Mughals...

Shia Muslims destroy Sunni Muslim Mughals & defeat their armies 😂whipping them!

Muslims killing Muslims for the throne of India.







Nader Shah, the ruler of Persia, famously took the Koh-i-Noor diamond from the Mughal treasury in 1739 after defeating Emperor Muhammad Shah and sacking Delhi. He is credited with naming the jewel "Koh-i-Noor" (Mountain of Light) upon seeing it. Following his assassination in 1747, the diamond passed to his general, Ahmad Shah Durrani.
Key details regarding Nader Shah and the Koh-i-Noor:
  • The Acquisition: After defeating the Mughals at the Battle of Karnal in 1739, Nader Shah entered Delhi. He reportedly acquired the diamond through a shrewd "friendly exchange" of turbans with the defeated Mughal Emperor Muhammad Shah, who had hidden it in his turban.
  • The Loot: The diamond was taken along with other immense treasures, including the Peacock Throne.
  • Origin of the Name: When Nader Shah first saw the magnificent stone, he is said to have exclaimed "Koh-i-Noor" (Mountain of Light).
  • Transfer of Ownership: Upon Nader Shah's death in 1747, the stone came into the possession of his bodyguard, Ahmad Shah Abdali (Durrani), who took it to Afghanistan.
  • Legacy: Nader Shah's removal of the stone from India is considered a pivotal point in the diamond's history, moving it from the Mughal empire to Persian, then Afghan, Sikh, and finally British control.
Nader Shah’s reign was marked by this immense theft, which is a major part of the diamond's "bloody" history and the legends of its curse, which was believed to affect male rulers who possessed it.


Will Durant: Islamic Muslim invasion of India

 Will Durant argued in his 1935 book “The Story of Civilisation: Our Oriental Heritage” 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_Durant



Wrote: Islamic Muslim invasion of India



"The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus...Forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children"

Source: Indian Epic Values

Rāmāyaṇa and Its Impact : Proceedings of the 8th International Rāmāyaṇa Conference, Leuven, 6-8 July 1991

Originally published: 1995

Editor: Gilbert Pollet

1995 https://amazon.co.uk/Indian-Epic-Values-Orientalia-Lovaniensia/dp/9068317016

Islamic Muslim invasion of India



Friday, March 6, 2026

Islams Darkest Hidden Secrets: Who killed Aisha?





My X: https://x.com/NehaKulkarni108/status/1975194990365262223

1) Majority of Shia Muslims hate Aisha.


2) Shias claim Aisha was killed.


3) Shias celebrate Aishas death.


4) Sunni Muslims adore & love Aisha.

     Sunni Muslims claim Aisha died of old age.


Video shows, Shias celebrating Aisha's death!

#Islam


Shias claim Aisha was killed:


"Mauweyah invited Ayesha for dinner, and he got a ditch dug in the ground, filling it up with sharp knives and swords, with their blades facing upwards."

https://shiachat.com/forum/topic/82506-muawiya-killed-aisha


Shias celebrate Aishas death


Sunni Muslim version of events:


Aisha died of old age.


"The books of biography and history state that ‘Aishah (may Allah be pleased with her) died at the age of sixty-three years, in 57 AH. "


1) https://islamqa.info/en/answers/124483

2) https://mahajjah.com/the-demise-of-sayyidah-aisha/


#Islam logic crushed!


Khusrau Khan 1320, formerly a Hindu, enslaved & forcefully converted to Islam

 When someone converts to this cult,  

mind explodes. Example:

Khusrau Khan 1320, formerly a Hindu, enslaved & forcefully converted to Islam.

Soon, began his boot licking process, 

appease nut job Allah & his mentors.

Temple smashing, enslaving others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khusrau_Khan





#Dhurandhar 🤣

On a flip side, he also later took revenge upon the Muslims, for converting him...Basically going undercover & dismantling their senior officers!
Hindus regained power.




Nasir ud-Din Khusrau Shah, better known as Khusrau Khan, was an Indian Sultan of Delhi for around two months in 1320. Originally from the Gujarat region, he was captured by the Delhi army during Alauddin Khalji's conquest of Malwa in 1305. After being brought to Delhi as a slave, he was converted to Islam. After ascending the throne in 1316, Mubarak Shah gave him the title "Khusrau Khan", and greatly favoured him.

Khusrau Khan led a successful campaign to reassert Delhi's control over Devagiri in 1317. The next year, he led an army that besieged Warangal, forcing the Kakatiya ruler Prataparudra to resume tribute payments to Delhi. In 1320, he led a group of Baradus and disgruntled nobles to assassinate Mubarak Shah, and ascended the throne with the regnal name Nasiruddin. However, he was soon deposed by a group of rebels led by the noble Malik Tughluq, who succeeded him on the throne.

According to the Delhi chronicler Amir Khusrau, Khusrau Khan and his brother belonged to a Hindu military caste or group called Baradu.[1] The name of this group has been variously transliterated as Barau, Barvari or Parvar.[2] Some writers have identified this group as Bharwad, that is, shepherd.[3][4][5][6] The Baradus were nominally converts to Islam, but retained some affiliations with Hinduism. In 1305, during the reign of Alauddin Khalji, they were captured when the Delhi forces led by Ayn al-Mulk Multani conquered Malwa in central India. They were brought as slaves to Delhi, where they converted to Islam, and were named Hasan (later Khusrau Khan) and Husamuddin (or Hisamuddin). They were brought up by Alauddin's naib-i khas-i hajib Malik Shadi.[1]

The two brothers acted as passive homosexuals to maintain their status and position.[1] Alauddin's son Mubarak Shah fell in love with Hasan: he preferred Hasan as a homosexual partner, but turned to Husamuddin whenever Hasan was unavailable. Their relationship was not a secret, and Mubarak and Hasan exchanged hugs and kisses in public.[1]

After Alauddin's death in 1316, his slave-general Malik Kafur appointed the minor prince Shihabuddin Omar as a puppet ruler. Shortly after, Malik Kafur was killed, and Shihabuddin's half brother Mubarak Shah usurped the throne. Mubarak Shah gave Hasan the title Khusrau Khan, with the former fief of Malik Kafur. Within a year, Khusrau Khan was promoted to the post of vazir.[7] According to the chronicler Barani, Mubarak Shah became "so enamored by Hasan ... that he did not want to be parted from him for a moment."[8] Mubarak Shah appointed Khusrau Khan's brother Husamuddin as the governor of Gujarat. Husamuddin later became an apostate (from Islam), because of which the local nobles of Gujarat arrested him, and brought him to Delhi in chains. However, Mubarak Shah merely slapped him, and gave him a high position in the royal court.

Military career under Mubarak Shah

The Yadavas of Devagiri, who had become tributaries to Delhi during Alauddin's reign, asserted their independence after Malik Kafur's death. After consolidating his rule in Delhi, Mubarak Shah led a campaign to Devagiri in 1317, forcing the Yadava leader Harapala-deva and his prime minister Raghava to flee. Khusrau Khan, along with Malik Qutlugh, led an army to pursue them.[10] The Delhi forces completely routed Raghava's army.[11] Khusrau Khan then dispatched a force led by Malik Ikhtiyaruddin Talbagha to pursue Harapaladeva, who was later captured and beheaded.[12]

Another tributary, the Kakatiya ruler Prataparudra, stopped making tribute payments to Delhi after Alauddin's death. In 1318, Mubarak Shah sent an army led by Khusrau Khan, Malik Qutlugh, and Khwaja Haji to besieged Warangal, the capital of Prataparudra.[12] Prataparudra surrendered, and agreed to make regular tribute payments.[13] After this victory, Khusrau Khan marched to Ellora, where Mubarak Shah had been residing for a month. The rest of the army joined him on the banks of the Narmada River on his way back to Delhi.


Assassination of Mubarak Shah

Chronicler Ziauddin Barani writes that Khusrau Khan resented "the way the Sultan forced himself upon him and took advantage of him", and secretly planned revenge against him.[8] Mubarak's other subordinates warned him about Khusrau's treacherous plans, but while being sodomized by the Sultan, Khusrau convinced him that the accusers were falsely slandering him.[14]

Khusrau Khan also convinced Mubarak Shah to allow him to raise an army of Baradu Hindus by arguing that all other nobles (maliks) had their own groups of followers. He enlisted several soldiers at Bahilwal (near Mount Abu) and in the province of Gujarat. According to Tughluq Nama, this army included 10,000 Baradu horsemen, and was commanded by several Hindu chiefs (rais and ranas).[15]

Next, Khusrau Khan contacted officers who resented Sultan Mubarak Shah, and conspired with them to kill the Sultan in the royal palace. He told the Sultan that he wanted his men to be granted access to the palace, so that they could meet him without requiring him to leave the Sultan's company. The Sultan obliged, and subsequently, every night 300-400 Baradus started entering the palace. They assembled in the former chambers of Malik Kafur on the ground floor of the palace, which had been assigned to Khusrau Khan.[15]

On 7 May 1320, Qazi Ziyauddin, a teacher of the Sultan, suggested an investigation into the assembly of the Baradus. However, the Sultan angrily dismissed the suggestion, and none of the nobles dared to make a similar suggestion.[16] Barani claims that, when the Sultan told Khusrau Khan about Qazi Ziyauddin's suggestion, Khusrau Khan won over his confidence by making love with him.[17]

On the night of 9 July 1320, Qazi Ziyauddin visited the ground floor of the palace to supervise the palace guard.[17] Randhol, the maternal uncle of Khusrau Khan, entered the palace with a large number of Baradus, who hid daggers under their clothes. When Ziyauddin let his guard down to accept a paan (betel leaf preparation) from Randhol, the Baradu leader Jaharya stabbed him to death.[18] The Sultan, who was in the company of Khusrau Khan on the upper floor, heard the commotion caused by Ziyauddin's murder. However, Khusrau Khan told him that the royal horses had broken loose, and the noise was caused by the guards trying to catch the animals. Meanwhile, Jaharya and other Baradus entered the upper floor, and killed the Sultan's special guards - Ibrahim and Ishaq. The Sultan now realized that a rebellion was happening against him, and tried to escape to his harem, which was located a floor above. However, Khusrau Khan stopped him by seizing his hair. The Sultan knocked Khusrau Khan to the ground, and sat on his chest, but Khusrau Khan did not let go of his hair. Meanwhile, Jaharya arrived at the scene, stuck a patta (axe) at the Sultan's chest, lifted him up by his hair, and threw him to the ground. He then beheaded the Sultan, and the head was later thrown in the courtyard on the ground floor. The Baradus massacred the palace residents, while the royal guards fled to save their lives.[19]

To eliminate any possible claimants to the thorne, the Baradus then entered the royal harem. They asked for the surviving sons of Alauddin to be produced before them, declaring that they intended to install one of the princes on the throne, and the others as provincial governors. The mothers of the princes did not believe the Baradus, and tried to hide them. However, the Baradus found the princes, and killed the eldest among them – Farid Khan (fifteen years old) and Abu Bakr Khan (fourteen years old) – after allowing them to say their final prayers. They also killed Mubarak Shah's mother Jhatyapali. They blinded three other sons of Alauddin - Bahauddin Khan (eight years old), Ali Khan (eight years old), and Usman Khan (five years old); these princes were imprisoned at the Red Palace (Qasr-i Lal). According to the 16th century writer Firishta, even Malik Nusrat – who had renounced royal life to become a dervish – was killed, because he was the nephew ( son of a sister ) of Alauddin.[20]

Reign

Khusrau Khan initially planned to install a son of the deceased Sultan on the throne as a puppet ruler. However, his advisors suggested that a prince would have him killed after his accession, and therefore, he decided to claim the throne himself.[21]

After killing the Sultan and potential claimants to the throne, the conspirators persuaded or compelled the various nobles to come to the first floor of the royal palace at midnight, and accept Khusrau Khan as the new king. According to Barani, the following nobles were held as "hostages" at midnight: Ayn al-Mulk Multani, Wahiduddin Quraishi, Bahauddin Dabir, and three sons of Malik Qara Beg. No information is available about the discussions between the conspirators and the nobles, but by the sunrise, all the nobles at the palace had accepted Khusrau Khan's accession to the throne as Sultan Nasiruddin.[20]

Shortly after ascending the throne, Khusrau Khan married the widow of Mubarak Shah. This marriage was declared invalid after Khusrau Khan was deposed, as according to the Muslim law, the widow could remarry only when four menstruation periods had passed after her husband's death.

Religious outlook

Barani portrays the killing of Mubarak Shah as a Hindu-Muslim conflict.[22] He claims that 5–6 days after Khusrau Khan's ascension to the throne, the Baradus and other Hindus started idol worship in the palace, and would sit on the Quran. The Baradus obtained control of the houses of the former Muslim nobles, along with their women and slave-girls. The Hindus rejoiced at Khusrau Khan's ascension, hoping to weaken the Muslims, and make Delhi a Hindu-majority city again.[24] Additionally, Khusrau’s prohibition of cow slaughter alienated many Muslim nobles, who after just four months transferred their loyalty to Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq, a popular and experienced commander who had repulsed several Mongol invasions in the Punjab.[25]

Pakistani-Canadian academic Aziz Ahmad writes that after usurping the kingdom, Khusrau Khan "reverted to his ancient faith, began a reign of terror heaping dishonour on Muslim nobles".[26]

According to Indian historian Mohammad Habib, Barani's narrative is unreliable, and contradicted by more reliable sources. Khusrau Khan wished to be seen as a normal Muslim monarch, and had the khutba in the mosques read in his name. Apart from Qazi Ziyauddin, whose wife and child had run away after his killing, the Baradus did not seize houses of Muslim nobles, many of whom were appointed to regular government posts under Khusrau


Build houses for the living not tombs for the dead!

 

Build houses for the living not tombs for the dead!

Based on my X tweet: https://x.com/NehaKulkarni108/status/2029929119664734685


Benefits of Islam:

India: "Delhi had 704 listed graveyards, but only 131 were functional, with some facing imminent closure due to lack of space."

1) https://english.alarabiya.net/features/2019/01/01/In-two-years-there-will-be-no-burial-space-left-for-Muslims-in-Indian-capital


In two years, there will be ‘no burial space’ left for Muslims in Indian capital

And as the situation continues to worsen, shortage of space in New Dehi's 113 graveyards continues to trouble Muslims.  A recent study conducted by NGOs Human Development Society and Ullhas, at the request of the Delhi Minority Commission, shows that in two years there will be no burial space left for Muslims, who make up 13 per cent of Delhi’s population.

  



2) https://www.habitatforhumanity.org.uk/country/india/


India is facing a major housing crisis, with an estimated shortage of 10 to 29 million urban units, largely affecting low-income groups. Despite this, over 10 million homes remain vacant, revealing a deep mismatch between luxury supply and affordable demand. Key factors include high property costs, rapid urbanization, and a shift towards premium, rather than affordable, development.
Key Aspects of the Housing Shortage
  • Magnitude of Need: Over 18.8 million urban families and 43 million rural families need affordable housing.
  • The Paradox of Vacancy: While millions lack homes, roughly 10-11 million urban housing units are vacant, often held as speculative investments or "black money".
  • Impacted Demographic: Over 95% of the housing shortage impacts the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) and Lower Income Group (LIG) segments.
  • Urbanization Pressure: An additional 25 million affordable homes may be needed by 2030 to accommodate rapid urbanization.
  • Key Factors: High land costs, strict regulations, and a shift in developer focus from affordable to luxury housing.
  • Government Initiatives: The Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY) aims to address this, but challenges in implementation remain.

Sanatani4ever.: https://sanatani4ever.freeforums.net/thread/75/build-houses-living-tombs-dead

Dhurandhar 2 Trailer & Ilyas Kashmiri (Pk Barbaric Butcher!)

  I created the previous post into a video Exposing Pakistani #Muslims . Examination of Arjun Rampal's dialogue. ..And I quote: Pakis...